Credit: Unsplash

The video game publisher is under fire for severe workplace toxicity.

Activision Blizzard, the hybrid video game publishing giant, has been slapped with a lawsuit by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. This lawsuit, built from a two-year investigation into the company’s workplace atmosphere and ethics, alleges that Activision Blizzard employees regularly engage in severely toxic “frat house” behavior, including racial and sexual discrimination and harassment.

The lawsuit, originally reported by Bloomberg Law, cites reports from Activision Blizzard employees that have been victimized by this behavior, the vast majority of whom are either women or minority. Female employees in particular are constantly subjected to unwanted sexual advances and non-consensual physical contact, as well as having work foisted on them by superiors who spend the day playing video games. Much of this is rooted in a prevalent “bro culture” in the office, which in addition to harassing female employees, includes frequent instances of binge drinking referred to as “cube crawls.”

The lawsuit also features several shocking stories, including one of a female employee who allegedly committed suicide after being subjected to power harassment by a male supervisor on a company trip. For these allegations and more, the DFEH is seeking a trial by jury, and should they win the case, they demand that the company comply with workplace protection standards, as well as adjustments to pay and benefits for female employees.

Activision Blizzard, for its part, has denied all allegations. “We value diversity and strive to foster a workplace that offers inclusivity for everyone,” a spokesperson said. “There is no place in our company or industry, or any industry, for sexual misconduct or harassment of any kind. We take every allegation seriously and investigate all claims. In cases related to misconduct, action was taken to address the issue.”

“The DFEH includes distorted, and in many cases false, descriptions of Blizzard’s past,” continues the statement. “We have been extremely cooperative with the DFEH throughout their investigation, including providing them with extensive data and ample documentation, but they refused to inform us what issues they perceived. They were required by law to adequately investigate and to have good faith discussions with us to better understand and to resolve any claims or concerns before going to litigation, but they failed to do so.”